Nuclear Waste Water to Reach the West Coast of USA

Ok. the USA citizens, look at this PDF : http://yamamototaku.jp/article/alps_zanzon/

I’ll translate it for you guys.

東京電力の 2020 年 12 月 24 日発表資料を基に作成 = write on based TEPCO report from 12/24/2020
福島第一原発から海洋放出される予定の核種一覧 = List of nuclides expected to be released at sea from Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant
番号 = Index Number
核種名 = nuclide name
半減期 = half-life
天然 or 人工 = natural or synthetic. almost synthetic.
通常の原発排水に 含まれる核種 = a nuclide contained in normal nuclear wastewater
通常の原発排水に含まれない核種 = is not
自民党 / 総合エネルギー戦略調査会 = Liberal Democratic Party / General or Overall Energy Strategy Research Group
会長代理 / 衆議院議員 /山本 拓 = acting chairman / a member of the House of Representatives / Yamamoto Taku

List of dangerous radioactive nuclides in PDFs.

1. H-3
   It’s marked with highlighting. Does it mean it’s not too dangerous? but how about other radionuclides below?
2. Sr-90
   Wow..? It’s processed? In Wikipedia, Strontium-90 is classified as high-level waste. The half life is long, around 30 years. It can take hundreds of years to decay to negligible levels. Exposure from contaminated water and food may increase the risk of leukemia and bone cancer.
   How about you think?
3. Ru-106
   I’ve quoted some of the link.
   106Ru decays to rhodium-106, which has a very short half also decaying via β− particle emission. Early studies on animals indicated that following internalisation ruthenium isotopes tend to accumulate in the major internal organs (kidney, spleen, lungs) and the bone.
   Wow, kidney, spleen, lungs and the born.
4. I-129
   It is a nuclide that easily sticks to the thyroid gland, and half-life is 15.7 million years.
5. Cs-137
   Cs-137 is very famous typical radionuclides. so please read “Health risk of radioactive caesium” on the Wikipedia page.
6. Co-60
   It’s a nuclide that’s used a lot when making GMO food, right?

First of all, is there a way for the IAEA or Japan to solve all of these radionuclides? how long will it take to intimidate the American people and people on the North Pacific coast? How did you measure the cost?
The IAEA, the U.S. and Japan, if they have the technology to solve these problems, please make it as transparent as possible.